2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Finishing Forces in Double Disk Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process While Finishing Paramagnetic Workpiece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polishing pressure P provides the indentation force to the abrasive particle during finishing operation [6,20]. So as the indentation force increases, material removal rate increases and finishing becomes faster [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The polishing pressure P provides the indentation force to the abrasive particle during finishing operation [6,20]. So as the indentation force increases, material removal rate increases and finishing becomes faster [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When magnetic field is applied on these MAPs, they form a chainlike structure whose strength and stiffness depend on the applied magnetic flux density [4,5]. Aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 for soft material) and silicon carbide (SiC for hard material) have been used as the most common abrasive particles [6][7][8]. These MAPs may be used in bonded or unbounded form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observations indicate that three types of energies that are repulsive forces, tangential forces and normal forces are necessary for magnetization of abrasives [5]. Lin et al (2007) utilized MAF to perform free-form surface abrasion of stainless SUS304 stainless steel [6 magnetic flux density of non-ferrous materials (magnesium) on the opposite side of the work piece, to evaluate the results [7 process for the flat surface of (copper alloy) torque [8]. Sihag et al (2015), introduces a new MAF process oxidation, for faster processing of surface finishing the effect of various parameters such as work gap, c work piece [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the percentage change in surface roughness (%ΔRa) is influenced by abrasive particles mesh size followed by percentage weight of abrasive particles, electromagnet rotations per minute, and applied voltage during finishing of AISI 52100 steel using MAF process [15]. Kala and Pandey [16] measured finishing force and torque during double disk magnetic abrasive finishing process. The normal finishing force is significantly affected by lower and upper working gap as well as finishing torque [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%