2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on interfacial damage characteristics of CRTS II slab track and CA mortar with AE and DIC techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, at measurement point 1, the surface hardness of the model exhibits the highest growth rate, which is 11.61%. Furthermore, within the contact region (measurement points 1-19), the average surface hardness increase percentage is 8.29%, while at other locations beyond this region (measurement points [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the average hardness growth rate is only 1.53%. Nevertheless, after enduring 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the average surface hardness of the model before the impact decreased by 18.9% compared to the not frozen-thawed model, and the magnitude of surface hardness growth of the model becomes more pronounced, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Hardness Results Of the Track Slabs Impact Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, at measurement point 1, the surface hardness of the model exhibits the highest growth rate, which is 11.61%. Furthermore, within the contact region (measurement points 1-19), the average surface hardness increase percentage is 8.29%, while at other locations beyond this region (measurement points [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the average hardness growth rate is only 1.53%. Nevertheless, after enduring 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the average surface hardness of the model before the impact decreased by 18.9% compared to the not frozen-thawed model, and the magnitude of surface hardness growth of the model becomes more pronounced, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Hardness Results Of the Track Slabs Impact Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, within the contact region (measurement points 1-19), the wave velocity average decrease is significant, with a value of 5.08%. But at other measurement points beyond this region (measurement points [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the average decrease is only 1.23%. However, after undergoing 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the average wave velocity of the model before the impact decreased by 24.25% compared to the not frozen-thawed model.…”
Section: Wave Velocity Results Of the Track Slabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation