2007
DOI: 10.1149/1.2728039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Ion Penetration into Pores with Pore Fractality at Carbon Electrode for EDLC

Abstract: Ion penetration into pores during double-layer charging/discharging has been investigated by analyses of potentiostatic current transients ͑PCTs͒ and cyclic voltammograms ͑CVs͒ experimentally measured on porous carbon electrodes with pore fractality. From the analyses of the cathodic PCTs measured on microporous electrodes, it was found that the PCTs showed ideal behavior with a slope of −0.5 in the earlier stage, indicating that the change in the resistance-capacitance ͑RC͒ time constant distribution produced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is well understood for planar electrodes in bulk solution, where the characteristic charging time is defined by τ c = λ D H / Ɗ (where H is the distance between electrodes and Ɗ is the ion diffusion coefficient) 19 22 , but for the case of EDL charging in nano-confined geometries (as in porous electrodes) the dynamics may be much slower. This is because, in small diameter pores, changes to the EDL are constrained by the limited supply of ions within the pore 23 27 and the time for ions to access the entire pore from the reservoir with which it is in contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is well understood for planar electrodes in bulk solution, where the characteristic charging time is defined by τ c = λ D H / Ɗ (where H is the distance between electrodes and Ɗ is the ion diffusion coefficient) 19 22 , but for the case of EDL charging in nano-confined geometries (as in porous electrodes) the dynamics may be much slower. This is because, in small diameter pores, changes to the EDL are constrained by the limited supply of ions within the pore 23 27 and the time for ions to access the entire pore from the reservoir with which it is in contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low frequency, ω < ω H , the CPE behavior results from the heterogeneity in the surface of micropores unlike from distribution of penetration length or pore size. , We observed from the plots that the bimodal porous electrode embedded with cylindrical micropores with high surface heterogeneity characterized by low γ* value have slower interfacial EDL dynamics than lesser heterogeneous surface with higher value of γ*. The effect of heterogeneity is very strong in low frequency CPE regime which also indicates that the presence of such features will be important in charge storage in porous carbon supercapacitor. , Glassy carbon electrodes with edge and basal orientation have γ* in the range of 0.91 and 0.96 . This is also prominent in the phase plot (b), which shows lowering in value from ideal 90° to lesser values around 80° and 70° for highly heterogeneous surface with γ* as 0.9 and 0.8, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The effect of heterogeneity is very strong in low frequency CPE regime which also indicates that the presence of such features will be important in charge storage in porous carbon supercapacitor. 49,50 Glassy carbon electrodes with edge and basal orientation have γ* in the range of 0.91 and 0.96. 51 This is also prominent in the phase plot (b), which shows lowering in value from ideal 90°to lesser values around 80°and 70°for highly heterogeneous surface with γ* as 0.9 and 0.8, respectively.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when scan rates increased, ions moved very fast. Large pores are necessary to offer enough large channels for rapid motion of the ions [15,16]. The templated carbon in this paper thus has large capacity at higher scan rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%