2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on progressive failure process and permeability characteristics of red sandstone under seepage pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, after 200 and 400°C heated, the P 3 value and the proportion of macropores did not change significantly compared with the room temperature samples, indicating that new pores and cracks of large pore size did not appear at 200 and 400°C. These results further explain the observation of many scholars that when the temperature is kept lower than 400°C, the strength of the treated sample, instead of decreasing significantly, increased in comparison with the ambient temperature sample 35,36 When the treatment temperature reached 600°C, compared with the ambient temperature sample, the three peaks of the T 2 spectrum increased significantly, among which the peak points P 1 , P 2 and P 3 were 0.38%, 0.29%, and 0.0071%, reflecting increases of 13.3%, 248.8%, and 184%, respectively.…”
Section: Test Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, after 200 and 400°C heated, the P 3 value and the proportion of macropores did not change significantly compared with the room temperature samples, indicating that new pores and cracks of large pore size did not appear at 200 and 400°C. These results further explain the observation of many scholars that when the temperature is kept lower than 400°C, the strength of the treated sample, instead of decreasing significantly, increased in comparison with the ambient temperature sample 35,36 When the treatment temperature reached 600°C, compared with the ambient temperature sample, the three peaks of the T 2 spectrum increased significantly, among which the peak points P 1 , P 2 and P 3 were 0.38%, 0.29%, and 0.0071%, reflecting increases of 13.3%, 248.8%, and 184%, respectively.…”
Section: Test Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Wang et al (2015) found that there were obvious weakening effects of seepage pressures on the mechanical properties after coarse sandstone damages. Xiao et al (2020) applied triaxial compressive test on red sandstone under seepage pressure and concluded that seepage pressure reduced the stress eigenvalues of rocks and affected its value of strain stiffness. Kou et al (2021) reported that seepage pressure promotes tensile crack initiation and propagation of artificial rock-like materials, and its ultimate failure mode transforms from pure shear failure mode to the mixed tensile-shear one with the increase in seepage pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractured Sandstone. According to the assumption of a smooth parallel plate [31,36], the relationship between the seepage flow rate and the average gap width of the sample containing cracks is…”
Section: Calculation Formula For Seepage Flow In Cut-throughmentioning
confidence: 99%