2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on seismic behavior of composite frame consisting of SRC beams and SRUHSC columns subjected to cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the yielding drift θ y can be determined according to the criteria suggested by farthest point method (Feng et al, 2017a) and the ultimate drift θ u can be determined by the test, at which point the lateral carrying capacity is close to 80% of the maximum value (Zhang and Jia, 2016). The lateral displacements and drift ratios which corresponding the four characteristic points are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where the yielding drift θ y can be determined according to the criteria suggested by farthest point method (Feng et al, 2017a) and the ultimate drift θ u can be determined by the test, at which point the lateral carrying capacity is close to 80% of the maximum value (Zhang and Jia, 2016). The lateral displacements and drift ratios which corresponding the four characteristic points are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the energy dissipation capacity of the SRUHSC frame during loading process, the first hysteresis loop at each displacement level is selected, and its area is calculated by numerical integration to get the cumulative energy dissipation curves at different loading displacements. The equivalent viscous damping coefficient h e was first proposed by Jacobson in 1930 (Zhang and Jia, 2016). It has become an important index, which is usually adopted to evaluate the energy dissipation capacity of the structure.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the concrete design codes of many countries, such as European nations, the United States, and China [10][11][12][13], the concrete strength is almost always limited within the range of C80; thus, a compressive strength value beyond 100 Mpa, which is usually defined by ultrahigh strength concrete, is not code-accessible, which consequently impedes the development of this structural system to some extent. Secondly, existing work has mainly focused on ordinary strength concrete at the component level [14][15][16][17][18], while research on the seismic behavior of SRUHSC frame structures still remains at the theoretical stage [19][20][21]. For the SRUHSC system, the influence of columns on the overall system, as well as the global response of the frame structure, has not been systematically explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%