2019
DOI: 10.29252/jafm.75.253.28442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on the Friction Drag Reduction of Superhydrophobic Surfaces in Closed Channel Flow

Abstract: Due to the importance of copper and its alloys in marine applications, the main objective of this research is to provide a simple, effective and low cost manufacturing approach to fabricate a superhydrophobic riblet copper surface with high drag reduction capability in laminar and turbulent flow regimes. Therefore, the riblets are produced by wire cut technique on the copper substrate and then by using a wet chemical method, a superhydrophobic coating is produced on the riblet surface. A pressure drop measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the 2D case, the riblets were primarily regarded as the typical 2D longitudinal grooved structures. So far, four kinds of explanations about the drag reduction mechanism of riblets have been publically re-ported: (1) spanwise inhibition, i.e., the spanwise movements of streamwise vortices were inhibited by riblets, which impaired the turbulent momentum transport near the wall surface and thereby reduced the skin-friction (Choi (1989), Chu and Karniadakis (1993), Monfared et al (2019)); (2) existence of protrusion height, i.e., the existence of the distance between virtual origin and riblet tip suppressed the spanwise shift of the viscous sublayer where the riblets were submerged, resulting in more stable low-speed streaks and lower bursting frequencies (Bechert and Bartenwerfer (1989), Luchini et al (1991), Gr u neberger and Hage (2011));(3) creation of a secondary vortex, i.e., a couple of secondary vortices generating near the riblet tip weakened the main streamwise vortical flow in the turbulent boundary layer, which retarded the strong interactions among neighboring streaks and subsequently kept a quasistatic flow in rib valley (Chu and Karniadakis (1993), Bacher and R. Smith (1986), Boomsma and Sotiropoulos (2016)); (4) uplifting of streamwise vortex, i.e., the ribs might uplift the streamwise vortices to decrease the ejection and sweeping events which were related with the high shear stress force in turbulent flows. Thus, the viscous drag force was reduced (Lee and Lee (2001), Martin andBhushan (2014), Huang et al (2016)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the 2D case, the riblets were primarily regarded as the typical 2D longitudinal grooved structures. So far, four kinds of explanations about the drag reduction mechanism of riblets have been publically re-ported: (1) spanwise inhibition, i.e., the spanwise movements of streamwise vortices were inhibited by riblets, which impaired the turbulent momentum transport near the wall surface and thereby reduced the skin-friction (Choi (1989), Chu and Karniadakis (1993), Monfared et al (2019)); (2) existence of protrusion height, i.e., the existence of the distance between virtual origin and riblet tip suppressed the spanwise shift of the viscous sublayer where the riblets were submerged, resulting in more stable low-speed streaks and lower bursting frequencies (Bechert and Bartenwerfer (1989), Luchini et al (1991), Gr u neberger and Hage (2011));(3) creation of a secondary vortex, i.e., a couple of secondary vortices generating near the riblet tip weakened the main streamwise vortical flow in the turbulent boundary layer, which retarded the strong interactions among neighboring streaks and subsequently kept a quasistatic flow in rib valley (Chu and Karniadakis (1993), Bacher and R. Smith (1986), Boomsma and Sotiropoulos (2016)); (4) uplifting of streamwise vortex, i.e., the ribs might uplift the streamwise vortices to decrease the ejection and sweeping events which were related with the high shear stress force in turbulent flows. Thus, the viscous drag force was reduced (Lee and Lee (2001), Martin andBhushan (2014), Huang et al (2016)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cassie state (Cassie and Baxter 1944) is maintained and the water does not completely contact the solid surface over flow, but forms an air-water interface with the gas between adjacent micropatterns, causing a concomitant reduction in wall shear stress and flow resistance. So far, the drag reduction technology of superhydrophobic surfaces has shown promising potential in applications such as underwater vehicles (Lee et al 2016;Monfared et al 2019), bionic sharkskin swimsuits (Monfared and Alidoostan 2020), water injection in oil reservoirs (Ijaola et al 2020), etc. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the drag reduction of superhydrophobic surfaces with flow field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%