2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the radiant heat flux of wall-attached fire plume generated by rectangular sources

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by Wan et al, 17 who state that the level of precision of the cuboid flame model is far higher than the traditional single-point source model when assessed against propane-based fire experiments. Both Huang et al 16 and Wan et al 17 have demonstrated a reduction in prediction error when applying the cuboid flame model when compared with the single-point source model for propane flame with diameter of 0.17 to 0.34 m; unlike with the single-point source model, the estimated heat flux data evaluated using the cuboid flame model are located within 620% error lines. The conclusions drawn by both Huang et al and Wan et al are at odds with Fleury et al 8 who suggest that the best-performing model on average for propane fire heat flux estimation is the single-point source model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is supported by Wan et al, 17 who state that the level of precision of the cuboid flame model is far higher than the traditional single-point source model when assessed against propane-based fire experiments. Both Huang et al 16 and Wan et al 17 have demonstrated a reduction in prediction error when applying the cuboid flame model when compared with the single-point source model for propane flame with diameter of 0.17 to 0.34 m; unlike with the single-point source model, the estimated heat flux data evaluated using the cuboid flame model are located within 620% error lines. The conclusions drawn by both Huang et al and Wan et al are at odds with Fleury et al 8 who suggest that the best-performing model on average for propane fire heat flux estimation is the single-point source model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Conversely, Huang et al 16 have stated through their research that both the single-point source model and the cuboid flame model are in good agreement with their propane gas fire experimental data. Nevertheless, the cuboid flame model appeared to achieve a slight improvement in terms of predicted percentage error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Poreh and Garrad [24] investigated the flame height of wall and corner fire plumes and proposed two similar correlations to estimate the effect of walls on the mean flame height were developed. Recently, several investigators [19][20][21][25][26][27] studied the influence of sidewalls on the burning behavior of pool fire. Hu et al [28,29] investigated the fire behavior of gas fires constrained by two parallel side walls and wall-attached fire impinging upon an inclined ceiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%