2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13344-022-0034-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Wave Attenuation Performance of A New Type of Floating Breakwater with Twin Pontoons and Multi Porous Vertical Plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows a comparison between the results of the transmission coefficient of different structural forms and the change in the wave steepness H/L under a fixed wave height, in which the wave height of the fixed comb-type floating breakwater and the fixed pontoon-type floating breakwater is H = 0.1 m [16]. The width of the fixed rectangular pontoon floating breakwater is 0.5 m, the water depth is 0.6 m, and the draft depth is 0.16 m. Since the wave heights of the floating pontoon breakwater in the literature are H = 0.075 m and 0.125 m [18], the transmission coefficient under the condition of H = 0.1 m is taken as the average value to enable comparison. The width of the floating pontoon breakwater is 0.5 m, the water depth is 0.6 m, and the draft depth is 0.15 m. The ratio of draft depth to water depth of the rectangular structure is relatively close to that of the comb structure in the present study.…”
Section: Comparisons With Existing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows a comparison between the results of the transmission coefficient of different structural forms and the change in the wave steepness H/L under a fixed wave height, in which the wave height of the fixed comb-type floating breakwater and the fixed pontoon-type floating breakwater is H = 0.1 m [16]. The width of the fixed rectangular pontoon floating breakwater is 0.5 m, the water depth is 0.6 m, and the draft depth is 0.16 m. Since the wave heights of the floating pontoon breakwater in the literature are H = 0.075 m and 0.125 m [18], the transmission coefficient under the condition of H = 0.1 m is taken as the average value to enable comparison. The width of the floating pontoon breakwater is 0.5 m, the water depth is 0.6 m, and the draft depth is 0.15 m. The ratio of draft depth to water depth of the rectangular structure is relatively close to that of the comb structure in the present study.…”
Section: Comparisons With Existing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floating box-plate breakwaters mainly include vertical and horizontal plates, among which vertical plates have poor wave protection under short-period waves, while horizontal plates have problems such as low structural safety [26]. Shen Yusheng et al [27] compared the wave protection effect of a double-row floating box with that of a single floating box type, finding that the wave protection effect of the former was significantly better than that of the latter; they also conducted a comparison of the wave protection effect when a double-row floating box was connected in different ways, and the results showed that the wave protection effect was the best when it was rigidly connected. Liu Weijie et al [28] invented a circular floating breakwater, including multiple circular arc-shaped floating breakwater units with the same radius of curvature connected, which does not need to consider the main wave direction, wave bypassing, etc., and forms a smooth circular area of water at sea; in addition, the distance between the inner and outer circles can be set independently according to the wavelength.…”
Section: Wave-proof Floating Photovoltaicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [6] introduced a novel floating rectangular box breakwater featuring a conical bottom section, which exhibits a notable capacity to resist overturning owing to its low center of gravity position. Shen et al [7] conducted an experimental investigation on the wave attenuation capabilities of a novel floating breakwater design featuring twin pontoons and multiple porous vertical plates. Their findings revealed that this proposed floating breakwater design outperforms the conventional single pontoon type in terms of wave attenuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%