Volume 4A: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions 2017
DOI: 10.1115/gt2017-63367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study to Enhance Resistance for Boundary Layer Flashback in Swirl Burners Using Microsurfaces

Abstract: Flame flashback has been one of the major instability problems in premixed gas turbine combustion with the potential to cause considerable damage to the combustion system hardware in addition to significant increase in pollutant levels. Swirl combustion has been proven as an effective flame stabilizer over a wide range of operation conditions, although swirling systems can be prone to various types of flashback under fuel premixed conditions. Unfortunately, using methodologies for the mitigation of one flashba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 and evaluating its first derivative to locate maxima and minima on either side of the peak positive axial velocity position, the width of the maximum velocity gradient could be evaluated. The width of this region increases by 9.6% from 8M to 8R (11.5-12.6 mm) at u ¼ 0.55 conditions and by 14.6% from 8M to 8R (12.6-14.5 mm) at u ¼ 0.80 conditions; a similar response which has been observed by others and corresponds to a reduced boundary layer thickness at the burner exit nozzle with increasing surface roughness of the nozzle ID wall [20].…”
Section: Swirl Flowsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 and evaluating its first derivative to locate maxima and minima on either side of the peak positive axial velocity position, the width of the maximum velocity gradient could be evaluated. The width of this region increases by 9.6% from 8M to 8R (11.5-12.6 mm) at u ¼ 0.55 conditions and by 14.6% from 8M to 8R (12.6-14.5 mm) at u ¼ 0.80 conditions; a similar response which has been observed by others and corresponds to a reduced boundary layer thickness at the burner exit nozzle with increasing surface roughness of the nozzle ID wall [20].…”
Section: Swirl Flowsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Maeda et al [19] utilized time-sequential Schlieren imaging to detail the influence of surface roughness on the deflagration-to-detonation transition of H 2 -O 2 mixtures in a 12 mm  10 mm channel, noting that the roughness increased flame acceleration, reducing the time of transition to detonation when compared with a smooth wall. In swirl combustion, Al-Fahham et al [20] considered the use of biomimetic microsurfaces in a burner nozzle to enhance boundary layer flashback resistance, observing a reduction in the thickness of the near-wall velocity gradient, a reduction in boundary layer turbulence intensity, and a positive shift in the flashback equivalence ratio, u. Finally, Pritz et al [21] found improved agreement between experimental results and large eddy simulation which included surface roughness along selected geometric boundaries versus smooth walls, confirming that surface roughness can influence flow and flame stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wire mesh structure provides small holes that trapped the air inside and helped to make a fluid cushion that separates the high-velocity region and the wall. This microsurface was numerically simulated and assessed somewhere else [35]. Experiments were conducted under both isothermal (no combustion) and combustion conditions under atmospheric pressure with no air preheating, using NG (90% methane) as fuel for the combustion trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 The geometry of the injection nozzles used [82] Al-Fahham et al [83] (2017) studied the impact of adding the microsurfaces grid as an inner lining to the nozzle on flame flashback in a tangential swirl burner experimentally and numerically, as shown in Figure 11. They noticed good agreement between both numerical and experimental results.…”
Section: Effect Of Swirl Burner Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%