2012
DOI: 10.5539/ijps.v4n1p66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Support of the Hedonistic Model of Desire

Abstract: This article analyzes experiments conducted by one of the authors of the article from the point of view of the hedonistic model of desire proposed by another author. We show that these independently conducted experiments and a number of the classical definitions of desire support the proposed model of desire. The model claims that terms "desire", "want", and their cognates describe changes of the Pleasantness of the State of a Subject (PSS) associated with the desire objects, and that the magnitude of these ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be underlined that the observed performance improvement, and therefore the usefulness of music, was present only with agreeable music and that unpleasant music tended to produce results that were often no different from controls. Such a result thus give a new evidence of the role of pleasurable experience in decision making (Cabanac & Bonniot-Cabanac, 2011;Ovsich & Cabanac, 2012;Ramírez et al, 2009;Cabanac & Bonniot-Cabanac, 2007;Ramírez, Bonniot-Cabanac, & Cabanac, 2005;Cabanac et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It must be underlined that the observed performance improvement, and therefore the usefulness of music, was present only with agreeable music and that unpleasant music tended to produce results that were often no different from controls. Such a result thus give a new evidence of the role of pleasurable experience in decision making (Cabanac & Bonniot-Cabanac, 2011;Ovsich & Cabanac, 2012;Ramírez et al, 2009;Cabanac & Bonniot-Cabanac, 2007;Ramírez, Bonniot-Cabanac, & Cabanac, 2005;Cabanac et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%