2010
DOI: 10.3390/sym2021180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Test of L- and D-Amino Acid Binding to L- and D-Codons Suggests that Homochirality and Codon Directionality Emerged with the Genetic Code

Abstract: L-amino acids bind preferentially to their D-codons, but almost nothing is known about whether D-amino acids correspondingly prefer L-codons, or how codon directionality affects amino acid binding. To investigate these issues, two D-RNA-oligonucleotides having inverse base sequences (D-CGUA and D-AUGC) and their corresponding L-RNA-oligonucleotides (L-CGUA and L-AUGC) were synthesized and their affinity determined for Gly and eleven pairs of L- and D-amino acids. The data support the hypothesis (Root-Bernstein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way preference of L-amino acids by D-bases triplets has been demonstrated [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Moreover, the non-biological affinity of D-amino acids by L-codons is also observed [8,16,17]. Besides, the hypothesis of coevolution of homochirality with the genetic code, makes a number of additional predictions such as the possibility that each codon can encode at least two different amino acids (according with the reading direction: 5´→ 3´or 3´→ 5´) so the eventual existence of more than a single code becomes possible [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This way preference of L-amino acids by D-bases triplets has been demonstrated [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Moreover, the non-biological affinity of D-amino acids by L-codons is also observed [8,16,17]. Besides, the hypothesis of coevolution of homochirality with the genetic code, makes a number of additional predictions such as the possibility that each codon can encode at least two different amino acids (according with the reading direction: 5´→ 3´or 3´→ 5´) so the eventual existence of more than a single code becomes possible [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…First we take into account that Miller-Urey like experiments on the synthesis of organic molecules in a primordial environment [32,33] show the formation of amino acids in racemic mixtures. Also, as we have already mentioned, by studying the affinity of amino acids with small RNA-oligonucleotides the preference of D-and L-bases triplets by L-and D-amino acids, respectively, has been observed [16], so we assume that from the beginnings, the two chirality systems (D-bases/L-amino acids) and (L-bases/D-amino acids) evolve independent one of the other. Moreover, as we describe next, the proposed evolution diagrams for the two systems are very similar since we assume that the changes in the corresponding genetic codes are basically independent of the chirality.…”
Section: Chiral Diagrams For the Evolution Of The Genetic Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Amino acid isomerization may also be an important factor in modifying protein or peptide structure, interaction, and receptor binding properties [16,19,33,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Difficulties In the Estimation Of Structure-function Relationships Between Specific Ligand-acceptor (Receptor) Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%