1992
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.1.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental tests for particle size‐dependent bioturbation in the deep ocean

Abstract: The potential for particle size-dependent bioturbation rates was experimentally tested at 1,240 m in the Santa Catalina Basin (eastern Pacific). Spherical glass bead tracers in five size classes (8-16,17-3 1,32-62,63-l 25, and 126-420 pm) were spread over the sediment surface and tube cored 997 d later. Downcore concentrations of' glass beads were enumerated in each of the five size categories and Page's L-test was used to test the null hypothesis of equal vertical penetration of all size classes of tracer. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental results from several settings suggest, however, that bioturbation in the deep sea is dominated by deposit feeders and that deposit feeders, in turn, preferentially ingest and retain fine particles others, 1988, 1995;Wheatcroft, 1992). The impact of this in the context of this study is that large particles, such as foraminifers, used for dating are not selected by deposit feeders for retention and apparently are not mixed vertically as much as the finer fractions of material.…”
Section: Bioturbation and Its Effect On Radiocarbon Dating Of Intersementioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experimental results from several settings suggest, however, that bioturbation in the deep sea is dominated by deposit feeders and that deposit feeders, in turn, preferentially ingest and retain fine particles others, 1988, 1995;Wheatcroft, 1992). The impact of this in the context of this study is that large particles, such as foraminifers, used for dating are not selected by deposit feeders for retention and apparently are not mixed vertically as much as the finer fractions of material.…”
Section: Bioturbation and Its Effect On Radiocarbon Dating Of Intersementioning
confidence: 83%
“…We expect some bias in sampling toward species that are physically larger owing to the large volume of samples to be processed and the ease with which large individuals brought the sample weight to the required minimum. The close match in dates between land and marine events observed in both Cascadia Basin and the northern San Andreas Fault suggests that, on the whole, neither bioturbation (Wheatcroft, 1992;Smith and others, 1993;Thomson and Weaver, 1994;Thomson and others, 1995) nor basal erosion significantly biases 14 C dates derived from planktic foraminifers following this procedure. A small number of events were not dated or had reversed and (or) incongruous dates, likely owing to excessive erosion and (or) bioturbation.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of this upon ages that might be measured on the fine carbonate fraction is shown in Figure 6 80 cm, but is only about 300 years greater than the Ixue age. Vertical biodiffusivity may be size-dependent, such that larger particles are less deeply mixed, and evidence suggests that the diffusivity of 250 I. tm sand is about a factor of 10 less than 10 gm silt [Wheatcroft, 1992]. In the simple bioturbation model used in this work, diffusion is regarded as operating infinitely fast with respect to the sedimentation rate.…”
Section: Bioturbation: a Simple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods used include the deliberate addition of inert particles (e.g. glass beads) to the sediment (Mahut and Graf 1987;Wheatcroft 1992), the use of labelled particles Wheatcroft et al 1994;Krezoski et al 1995) to act as tracers, the measurement of natural radionuclide deficits (Smethie et al 1981;Wheatcroft and Martin 1996) within the sediment and various techniques to directly measure sediment displacement (Rhoads 1967;Hickson 1994;Retraubun et al 1996). The degree of bioturbation is species specific and is closely related to the feeding mode and depth of the organism concerned, together with its motility, size and abundance as well as community composition (Rhoads 1974;Rhoads and Boyer 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%