2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental tests on new titanium alloy interbody cervical cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data could be used to assess the cage in the body environment. 44 The testing device was Zwick Roell (Zwick/ Roell, Servohydrolic, HCR 25-400, ZwickRoell GmbH & Co. KG) with a load cell of 20 kN. The test blocks were made of stainless steel.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data could be used to assess the cage in the body environment. 44 The testing device was Zwick Roell (Zwick/ Roell, Servohydrolic, HCR 25-400, ZwickRoell GmbH & Co. KG) with a load cell of 20 kN. The test blocks were made of stainless steel.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technology, we can create cages with controlled porosity with a solid part that is characterized by high purity and rough surface enhancing osteointegration. 153 A biomechanical experimental study demonstrated 3 different cages (standard PEEK cage and two innovative Ti alloys made by electron beam melting (EBM) technology by MT Ortho) subjected to static compression test with encouraging results. It showed that mechanical and functional failure of the innovative cages occurred due to the load value greater than the physiological one of the cervical spine.…”
Section: Egyptian Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed that mechanical and functional failure of the innovative cages occurred due to the load value greater than the physiological one of the cervical spine. 153 A different array of standalone cages was evaluated as follows: 45 a composite Ti/PEEK integral fixation cages which offered efficacy in ACDF procedures, 145 another standalone system; Zero-P cervical cage with a zero-profile plate and Ti cages with promising clinical results; 159 the ROI-C cage (LDR Medical, France), one of the devices developed to increase immediate spinal stability and avoid anterior plating and iliac crest bone grafting; 74 zero-profile cages made of PEEK with VerteBRIDGE TM double anchoring system and self-locking plate (Figures 4 and 5). Novel osteoinductive ceramic implants have antiinfective properties, higher fracture resistance, and semiradiolucent with promising results in spine fusion surgeries.…”
Section: Egyptian Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading efforts to reduce the above problems concentrate on the employment of functional materials, such as superelastic alloys [ 8 ], and the development of porous [ 9 , 10 ] and patient-specific [ 11 , 12 ] spinal devices. Superelastic alloys have a lower modulus of elasticity than the traditionally used metallic implant materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%