12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Training and Validation of a System for Aircraft Acoustic Signature Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our previous study [13] was targeted mainly at the sound sources of rotorcraft, the classification of rotorcraft noise is relatively easy because rotorcraft sound has characteristic frequency components with a dominant tonal sound, as suggested by Quaranta and Dimino [7,8]. In the present paper, we show the results of identifying jet aircraft models in two case studies conducted near Narita International Airport and Osaka International Airport.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our previous study [13] was targeted mainly at the sound sources of rotorcraft, the classification of rotorcraft noise is relatively easy because rotorcraft sound has characteristic frequency components with a dominant tonal sound, as suggested by Quaranta and Dimino [7,8]. In the present paper, we show the results of identifying jet aircraft models in two case studies conducted near Narita International Airport and Osaka International Airport.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Identification was conducted for three types of jet fighter aircraft model, and the identification accuracy was approximately 90%. In another study, Quaranta and Dimino [7] used a neural network to classify four types of sound source consisting of takeoff and landing sounds of two turboprop aircraft and one jet aircraft; they reported a total identification accuracy of 95%. However, using the same method, Quaranta and Dimino [8] reported that the accuracy rate decreased to no more than 90% when classifying nine sound sources comprising takeoff and landing jet aircraft sounds.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have been developing an aircraft model identification system that uses field measurements and machine learning, the aim being to use the frequency characteristics of aircraft noise to automatically classify the aircraft model associated with aircraft noise events. In Morinaga et al (2019) [2], we summarized the results of our previous studies [3][4][5] and those of studies conducted in other countries [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. We also reported the results of two case studies that were conducted in the vicinity of airports, each of which identified a different model of jet aircraft.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are also validated with previous experimental study conducted with same airship. Quaranta et al 18 identified acoustic signatures of the aeroplanes with ANN. In the procedure, ascending and descending noise of five different aircraft are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%