Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18442-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental trends from lateral cyclic tests of piles in sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long & Vanneste (1994) collated existing field test data from 34 studies and concluded, in general, that pile head movements were dependent on the nature of applied cyclic loads, the sand relative density (D r ) and the pile installation method. The subsequent systematic experimental investigations of Rosquoet et al (2007), and Truong & Lehane (2015) show that the accumulation coefficient (α y ) depends primarily on the cyclic load ratio ( c ) and to a lesser extent the cyclic magnitude ratio ( b ), and varies from a negative value for two-way loading ( c = -1) to between about 0.05 and 0.2 at  c values in the range of -0.5 to 0.75 (noting  c = 0 corresponds to one-way loading with H min = 0). LeBlanc et al (2010) and Albiker et al (2017) present formulations based on 1-g small scale tests in which the accumulation coefficient is considered independent of sand relative density, although scale issues associated with the very low stress level prevalent in these tests need to be acknowledged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long & Vanneste (1994) collated existing field test data from 34 studies and concluded, in general, that pile head movements were dependent on the nature of applied cyclic loads, the sand relative density (D r ) and the pile installation method. The subsequent systematic experimental investigations of Rosquoet et al (2007), and Truong & Lehane (2015) show that the accumulation coefficient (α y ) depends primarily on the cyclic load ratio ( c ) and to a lesser extent the cyclic magnitude ratio ( b ), and varies from a negative value for two-way loading ( c = -1) to between about 0.05 and 0.2 at  c values in the range of -0.5 to 0.75 (noting  c = 0 corresponds to one-way loading with H min = 0). LeBlanc et al (2010) and Albiker et al (2017) present formulations based on 1-g small scale tests in which the accumulation coefficient is considered independent of sand relative density, although scale issues associated with the very low stress level prevalent in these tests need to be acknowledged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Uniform cyclic loading causes a progressive accumulation of permanent pile rotation (and pile head displacement), with the additional rotation developed in each cycle reducing as the number of cycles (N) increases. Although accumulated rotation is often considered to vary with the logarithm of the number of cycles (Long & Vanneste, 1994), lateral pile experiments described by LeBlanc et al (2010), , Truong & Lehane (2015) and Li et al (2015), show that, for a given level and type of cycling, the ratio of rotation accumulated after N cycles ( N ) to the maximum (positive) rotation reached in the first cycle ( 1 ) is best represented for rigid piles as a power function of N i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of bearing capacity of these piles requires account for not only the interaction between the pipe pile and the outer soil, but also the interplay with the inner soil. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The soil layer inside the pipe pile usually does not conform to the displacement of soil outside the pile in pile penetration,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%