2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5011662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of calculated atomic charges in ionic liquids

Abstract: A combination of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy have been used to provide an experimental measure of nitrogen atomic charge in nine ionic liquids (ILs). These experimental results are used to validate charges calculated with three computational methods: charges from electrostatic potentials using a grid-based method (ChelpG), natural bond orbital (NBO) population analysis and the atoms in molecules (AIM) approach. By combining these re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently it was proposed that the BEs obtained from fitting the experimental XPS spectra for ILs correlate with the calculated atomic charges. [ 32,33 ] Figure 6 demonstrates a modest correlation between the BE approximated by the first and third terms of Equation ) (BE = V [ q i ]) and the calculated relative ΔKS BE values. The relation improves significantly by considering the effect of the electrostatic potential of neighboring atoms given by the second term in Equation ) (BE = V [ q i , q j ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently it was proposed that the BEs obtained from fitting the experimental XPS spectra for ILs correlate with the calculated atomic charges. [ 32,33 ] Figure 6 demonstrates a modest correlation between the BE approximated by the first and third terms of Equation ) (BE = V [ q i ]) and the calculated relative ΔKS BE values. The relation improves significantly by considering the effect of the electrostatic potential of neighboring atoms given by the second term in Equation ) (BE = V [ q i , q j ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 31 ] Fogarty et al found such correlation for the S 1s electrons ( R 2 = 0.98) and N 1s electrons ( R 2 = 0.94) between the experimental BEs and the computed atomic charges. [ 32,33 ] Kruusma et al calculated C 1s electrons' Kohn–Sham (KS) orbital energies and used their values for fitting the experimental spectra. [ 17 ] Similarly, Reinmöller et al used the KS orbital energies to calculate the BEs for the XPS spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45] The choice of the ChelpG method is based on the promising results reported by Lovelock and coworkers recently. 46 All of the input files are available in the Supporting Information (SI).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach, it is possible to obtain a better charge description due to the use of different representative structures from the IL pairs and the oligomer conformations 43–45 . The choice of the ChelpG method is based on the promising results reported by Lovelock and coworkers recently 46 . All of the input files are available in the Supporting Information (SI).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shifts < 0.5 eV in IL XP spectra in terms of atomic charges. 32,37 Despite this, correlations between core-electron B.E.s and physicochemical properties (e.g. Kamlettaft parameters) 21,22,31 support the drive for accurate peak fittings, regardless of the physical interpretation of the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%