2014
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling

Abstract: A boson sampling device is a specialized quantum computer that solves a problem that is strongly believed to be computationally hard for classical computers. Recently, a number of small-scale implementations have been reported, all based on multiphoton interference in multimode interferometers. Akin to several quantum simulation and computation tasks, an open problem in the hard-to-simulate regime is to what extent the correctness of the boson sampling outcomes can be certified. Here, we report new boson sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
367
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
367
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unitary transformations on optical modes have been used to implement single-particle quantum gates [1,2], quantum simulations [3], and boson sampling [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Traditionally, these transformations are implemented on spatial modes using a system of beam splitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unitary transformations on optical modes have been used to implement single-particle quantum gates [1,2], quantum simulations [3], and boson sampling [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Traditionally, these transformations are implemented on spatial modes using a system of beam splitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional boson sampling schemes that use spatial modes [which we refer to as spatial mode boson sampling (SMBS)], multiple identical photons enter a high-dimensional transformation over spatial modes, such as a system of beam splitters and phase shifters, while the output probability distribution is monitored with detectors at each of the output modes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several proposals have developed the idea of a linear optical quantum computer (LOQC), including Nielsen's proposal [2] of combining linear optics with cluster states, Browne and Rudolph's fusion mechanisms [5] to efficiently create optical cluster states and Kieling's et al proposal [4] of building an imperfect cluster that can be renormalized using ideas of percolation theory. While alternative schemes for LOQC [5] using parity state encoding [6] or small amplitude coherent states [7] have been proposed, we do not address these approaches in this manuscript.Recent demonstrations [8][9][10][11][12] have made significant progress towards experimental linear-optical quantum computing. In particular, the use of integrated photonics to implement large-scale, complex interferometers on a chip shows great promise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent demonstrations [8][9][10][11][12] have made significant progress towards experimental linear-optical quantum computing. In particular, the use of integrated photonics to implement large-scale, complex interferometers on a chip shows great promise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated efficiency is found to greatly surpass spectral filtering effects. Our findings open the path towards on-chip scalable indistinguishable-photon emitting devices operating at room temperature.Indistinguishable single photons are the building blocks of various optically-based quantum information applications such as linear optical quantum computing [1, 2], boson sampling [3][4][5][6][7], quantum teleportation [8] or quantum networks [9]. Indistinguishable photons are usually generated either using parametric down conversion [10], or alternatively directly from a single two-level quantum emitter such as atoms, color centers, quantum dots or organic molecules [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%