2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental verification of FOREV-2D simulations for the plasma shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CFC parameters (evaporation energy, and both heat conduction coefficient and heat diffusivity) are close to that of tungsten, and will give us similar estimate of the CFC's Êmax . Thus, we see that our simple model predicts the similar values of Êmax for both CFC and tungsten (even though the radiation capabilities of carbon and tungsten are very different), which agree very well with both experimental data [14,15] and rather comprehensive numerical simulation results [36]. But what is more important is that the model shows that Êmax depends very weakly (logarithmically) on such uncertain parameters as Ėrad and q 0 .…”
Section: Plasma-wall Interaction Issues Of Vapor-plasma Shieldingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CFC parameters (evaporation energy, and both heat conduction coefficient and heat diffusivity) are close to that of tungsten, and will give us similar estimate of the CFC's Êmax . Thus, we see that our simple model predicts the similar values of Êmax for both CFC and tungsten (even though the radiation capabilities of carbon and tungsten are very different), which agree very well with both experimental data [14,15] and rather comprehensive numerical simulation results [36]. But what is more important is that the model shows that Êmax depends very weakly (logarithmically) on such uncertain parameters as Ėrad and q 0 .…”
Section: Plasma-wall Interaction Issues Of Vapor-plasma Shieldingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Experiments with plasma guns followed by rather comprehensive numerical simulations [14,15,36] have demonstrated the impact of shielding effects as a response of the wall material (both CFC and tungsten) on the incident plasma heat flux, which is as high in magnitude as the heat flux caused by giant ELMs and disruptions in ITER. In particular, the vapor plasma shielding results in the saturation of the energy (per unit surface area) accumulated by the wall at some level, Êmax , even though the total energy (per unit surface area) delivered by plasma, E 0 , can be significantly larger than Êmax (see figure 6 in [14]).…”
Section: Plasma-wall Interaction Issues Of Vapor-plasma Shieldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without liquefied Be in the loaded area, the main damage mechanisms were the relief of thermally induced stresses via plastic deformation and crack formation. However, it has been reported that the melting threshold for Be drops with an increasing pulse number since the thermal conductivity in the heat affected zone is significantly reduced by at least a factor of four after 100 pulses with t = 1 ms and L abs = 900 MW m −2 due to crack formation [8,9] . Thus, even though the Be melting threshold initially is not exceeded by the exerted loading conditions, it could start to melt after several shots with the same loading conditions and then the observed BeO driven damage acceleration could be enabled.…”
Section: Damage Evolution With Pulse Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%