2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10697-005-0014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental verification of the gas-hydraulic analogy with reference to the dam-break problem

Abstract: The results of an experimental study of dam-break waves for both a dry and a flooded bottom in the lower pool are compared with the first approximation of shallow-water theory. It is shown that this approximation adequately describes the height and velocity of the hydraulic jump in the lower pool for a flooded bottom, does not describe the undulations, and is inconsistent with the experimental data on the perturbation propagation velocity in the upper and, for a dry bottom, in the lower pool.Keywords: dam brea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that significant differences between the classical and modified solutions occur only in the case h * 0 < h * c ≈ 0.14, where the flow (h 1 , u 1 ) behind the discontinuous-wave front is supercritical [12]. This explains why the solutions obtained for the classical system (2.1), (2.3) adequately reproduce the experimental flow pattern in the case where the initial tailwater and headwater depths satisfy the inequality h 0 > h * c H ≈ 0.14H, because of which the constant flow (h 1 , u 1 ) formed behind the discontinuous-wave front is subcritical [1,21,23].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Based On Shallow-water Theorymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is evident that significant differences between the classical and modified solutions occur only in the case h * 0 < h * c ≈ 0.14, where the flow (h 1 , u 1 ) behind the discontinuous-wave front is supercritical [12]. This explains why the solutions obtained for the classical system (2.1), (2.3) adequately reproduce the experimental flow pattern in the case where the initial tailwater and headwater depths satisfy the inequality h 0 > h * c H ≈ 0.14H, because of which the constant flow (h 1 , u 1 ) formed behind the discontinuous-wave front is subcritical [1,21,23].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Based On Shallow-water Theorymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where h(x, t) is the flow depth, q(x, t) is the specific discharge (per unit width of the channel), u = q/h is the flow velocity, z(x, t) = b(x) + h(x, t) is the free-surface level, b(x) is the vertical coordinate of the bottom (bed level), g is the acceleration due to gravity and γ = γ * H is a dimensional parameter (H is the characteristic flow depth, which, for the problem considered, is set equal to the initial headwater depth; γ * is a dimensionless parameter chosen so as to agree with the results of laboratory experiments [23]). Equation (2.1) is the law of conservation of mass, and equation (2.2) is the modified conservation law for the total momentum, which is derived in [26].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem Based On Shallow-water Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) and the acceleration due to gravity g. After conversion to dimensionless quantities, the number of geometrical parameters decreases to five, and the parameter g in the construction models remains dimensional. In the problem of a full dam break, the number of dimensionless geometrical parameters decreases to one [7]. In experiments, the wave propagation is influenced by the liquid viscosity, the hydraulic unevenness of the solid boundaries, the shape of the edges at the entrance to the breach, and the characteristics of movement of the shield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%