2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-07089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally Verified Numerical Investigation of the Sill Hydraulics for Abruptly Expanding Stilling Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many numerical investigations are found on HJs and energy dissipation using various numerical codes; however, Table 1 highlights a few of the most relevant studies dealing with HJs and energy dissipators. 1, some studies, e.g., [39,40,43,44,47,50,51,56], have focused HJs and their associated parameters such as velocity, free surface profile, sequent depths, roller lengths, and turbulent kinetics energy, whereas other researchers have investigated energy dissipation [41,45,46,48,[53][54][55] and scour [42,49] downstream of different hydraulic structures. However, except for the 1D Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) study on Taunsa barrage, the literature did not reveal any study that studied the effects of tailwater on the HJ and flow pattern in the barrage's basin.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamic and Hydraulic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many numerical investigations are found on HJs and energy dissipation using various numerical codes; however, Table 1 highlights a few of the most relevant studies dealing with HJs and energy dissipators. 1, some studies, e.g., [39,40,43,44,47,50,51,56], have focused HJs and their associated parameters such as velocity, free surface profile, sequent depths, roller lengths, and turbulent kinetics energy, whereas other researchers have investigated energy dissipation [41,45,46,48,[53][54][55] and scour [42,49] downstream of different hydraulic structures. However, except for the 1D Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) study on Taunsa barrage, the literature did not reveal any study that studied the effects of tailwater on the HJ and flow pattern in the barrage's basin.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamic and Hydraulic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 highlights a few of the relevant studies which have employed two equation RANS models. Carvalho et al [33] FLOW-3D RNG K-ε Velocity, roller lengths, free surface profile, TKEs Bayon et al [45] Open Foam, FLOW-3D RNG K-ε Velocity, HJ efficiency, roller length, sequent depths Aydogdu et al [46] ANSYS-FLUENT RNG K-ε Free surface profile velocity, turbulence kinetic energy (TKEs) Abd El Azim et al [47] FLOW-3D RNG K-ε Energy dissipation, relative energy loss Hence, based on the results of the above-mentioned studies, this study also employed RNG K-ε model (hereafter, called K-ε) for the turbulence and flow fields on rigid and erodible beds. For computing the turbulent kinetic energy (K) and its dissipation (ε), RNG K-ε model employs Equations ( 3) and (4), respectively.…”
Section: Turbulence Modeling and Free Surface Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also showed that DSJ was found to be more crucial in energy dissipation as it created reverse flow, which impinged on the free surface. Aydogdu et al implemented Fluent 14.5 software to study the effect of different shapes of central sills in the expanding stilling basin [6]. Out of the studied sills, Type-3 sills produced more promising results in free surface profiles, velocity distribution, and roller length of HJ and TKEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%