1936
DOI: 10.1007/bf02084166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Rauhigkeitsproblem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
180
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear stress (or drag) partitioning is traditionally used to quantify the proportion of the wind shear stress or shear velocity ( * ) that is acting on a soil surface, compared to the proportion acting on vegetation elements (e.g., [48,96,115]). The theoretical basis for partitioning comes from the work of Schlichting [116], who proposed that the total drag on a roughened surface ( ) can be expressed as:…”
Section: Effects On Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear stress (or drag) partitioning is traditionally used to quantify the proportion of the wind shear stress or shear velocity ( * ) that is acting on a soil surface, compared to the proportion acting on vegetation elements (e.g., [48,96,115]). The theoretical basis for partitioning comes from the work of Schlichting [116], who proposed that the total drag on a roughened surface ( ) can be expressed as:…”
Section: Effects On Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These irregular surfaces are more representative of real-world rough surfaces than traditional rough surfaces constructed from basic elements such as blocks and cones (see e.g. Schlichting 1936; Krogstad et al 2005;Orlandi & Leonardi 2008). Using DNS we are able to measure the flow not only above the rough surfaces but also within the rough surfaces, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent sand-grain roughness height, k s , was first defined by Schlichting (1936) as the size of the sand grains from the experiments of Nikuradse (1933) that gave effectively the same frictional resistance as the roughness under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%