2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2013.6649453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimenting Content-Centric Networks in the future internet testbed environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown in [6] that CCN performs better than TCP and also scales to numbers of requests to exponential magnitudes of nowadays needs. Similar results in [13] show that CCN introduces an overhead of 19% when compared with TCP/IP. But as the number of consumers increases, CCN outperforms TCP/IP and the download time in CCN is 25% less than it is in TCP/IP.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is shown in [6] that CCN performs better than TCP and also scales to numbers of requests to exponential magnitudes of nowadays needs. Similar results in [13] show that CCN introduces an overhead of 19% when compared with TCP/IP. But as the number of consumers increases, CCN outperforms TCP/IP and the download time in CCN is 25% less than it is in TCP/IP.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Both approaches have similarities like the fact to use containers and virtual switches for the Virtual Network Infrastructure and the fact to follow the ETSI guidelines concerning the Management and Orchestration of NFV [8]. MiniCCNx [2] also uses similar technologies but to offer an emulation environment for experimentation rather than to build a production network, while the authors of [9] propose their Future Internet Testbed with Security architecture to perform ICN experiments.…”
Section: State Of the Art 21 Nfv And Sdn Initiatives For Icnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They (S REG , and S REQ ) are assumed to be 100 bytes, which is small packet. The data retrieval packet is similar to one data chunk in CCN, which is assumed to be 4 Kbytes, which is a default chunk size in the implementation [9], [29]. The file size, S Data , is assumed to be 1 gigabytes.…”
Section: Performance Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%