1997
DOI: 10.1119/1.18675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimenting with magnetism: Ways of learning of Joann and Faraday

Abstract: This paper narrates learning as it evolved through experimental work and interpretation in two distinct investigations: the explorations of permanent magnets and needles conducted by a student, Joann, as I interactively interviewed her, and Faraday's initial experimenting with diamagnetism, as documented in his Diary. Both investigators puzzled over details, revisited their confusions resiliently, and invented analogies as ways of extending their questioning; ''misconceptions'' and conflict were not explicit t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relying in part on the continuation of the student conversation introduced above, we documented how, without being guided by a formulaic scientiÞc method, students could engage in productive scientiÞc inquiry, and teachers could value that activity as productive scientiÞc inquiry. With this established with our data, and supported by the research literature (Cavicchi, 1997;Hammer, 1995;Hammer et al, 2005;Rosenberg, Hammer, & Phelan, 2006;Sherin, diSessa, & Hammer, 1993;Smith, Maclin, Houghton, & Hennessey, 2000;Warren & Rosebery, 1995), we then use data to argue that attending to the scientiÞc method as commonly taught in schools (Carey & Smith, 1989;Windschitl, 2004) can distract both teachers and students from attending to students' productive scientiÞc inquiry.…”
Section: Revisiting the Opening Scenario: Scientific Methods Or Scientmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Relying in part on the continuation of the student conversation introduced above, we documented how, without being guided by a formulaic scientiÞc method, students could engage in productive scientiÞc inquiry, and teachers could value that activity as productive scientiÞc inquiry. With this established with our data, and supported by the research literature (Cavicchi, 1997;Hammer, 1995;Hammer et al, 2005;Rosenberg, Hammer, & Phelan, 2006;Sherin, diSessa, & Hammer, 1993;Smith, Maclin, Houghton, & Hennessey, 2000;Warren & Rosebery, 1995), we then use data to argue that attending to the scientiÞc method as commonly taught in schools (Carey & Smith, 1989;Windschitl, 2004) can distract both teachers and students from attending to students' productive scientiÞc inquiry.…”
Section: Revisiting the Opening Scenario: Scientific Methods Or Scientmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Gorman showed how the laboratory study of scientific thinking can be used as the basis for a deep understanding of thinking in a domain closely related to that of scientific discovery. Like Cavicchi (1997), his work has used the replication of objects in the service of both understanding and as a tool in education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In my view, even Faraday's "ways of knowing" (Cavicchi, 1997) are force centered; for him, one came to know the world partly by making the proper epistemic artifacts. In similar fashion we seek to make Faraday's model-based world of gold films and ruby fluids legible to us.…”
Section: Conclusion -Epistemic Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For similar views on the value of replication, seeCavicchi, 1997;Kurz & Hertwig, 2001;and Gooding, 1990. …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%