Exhibition Experiments 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470696118.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimenting with Representation: Iconoclash and Making Things Public

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dialogical terrain reflects the continuous making, becoming and emerging of a public sphere and lends empirical weight to its theoretical reconceptualization 'from a substance … to a movement' (Weibel and Latour, 2007). It also clearly shows that Māori's postcolonial political involvement is not confined to the internal procedures of Te Papa, but reaches into other public spheres of political negotiations and contestations.…”
Section: The Reflexive Museummentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This dialogical terrain reflects the continuous making, becoming and emerging of a public sphere and lends empirical weight to its theoretical reconceptualization 'from a substance … to a movement' (Weibel and Latour, 2007). It also clearly shows that Māori's postcolonial political involvement is not confined to the internal procedures of Te Papa, but reaches into other public spheres of political negotiations and contestations.…”
Section: The Reflexive Museummentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We advocate for understanding scripts in a context where they are entangled in the socio-material and material-semiotic practices that comprise the learning spaces we have set out to design. We perceive learning spaces, in our case classrooms and museum exhibition spaces, as assemblages [47], [48], constituted by the enactments of students, teachers, and exhibition staff in concert with the material objects that make up the learning space [49]. The actors of our assembly are both human and non-human, media and interactions, and includes the material; i.e.…”
Section: Inscriptions and Enactmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Latour, 'Making Things Public' drew on the double meaning of the term representation which in political science implies 'to gather the legitimate people around some issue' and in science and technology to 'present[s] or rather represent [s] what is the object of concern to the eyes and hears of those who have been assembled' exposing enactors, networks, and inscriptions. 'Contemporary avant-garde artists', observe Weibel and Latour (2007), 'respond sensitively to social changes by chaining the structure of their approach to their work and entering into new alliances with new forms of enactments' (p. 107). 'Making Things Public' thus engaged with ways of participation and agency within networks of human and non-human enactors in ways that were pertinent for an understanding of performativity for both the exhibition and the experiment.…”
Section: The Redefinition Of the Analogy Of The Exhibition As An Expementioning
confidence: 99%