2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and analysis on self-motion behaviors of liquid droplets on gradient surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced velocity in the case of the tilted surface is due to the influence of gravity which opposes the droplet movement. Comparable velocities have been reported on other surfaces with chemical gradients, but the reported materials lack the ease of tunability demonstrated here. With tunable surfaces based on photosensitive materials light‐controlled wettability changes and liquid transport can be achieved, but the reported velocities are much lower than observed here .…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…The reduced velocity in the case of the tilted surface is due to the influence of gravity which opposes the droplet movement. Comparable velocities have been reported on other surfaces with chemical gradients, but the reported materials lack the ease of tunability demonstrated here. With tunable surfaces based on photosensitive materials light‐controlled wettability changes and liquid transport can be achieved, but the reported velocities are much lower than observed here .…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…4.5. Once the velocity peak has passed, the droplet motion is controlled by the balance of three forces, resulting in overall decline of measured velocities to a few mm/s, in agreement with other publications [76,77,81].…”
Section: Capillary Spreading Over Striped Patterns: Second and Third supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The surface tension increases in a specific direction, changing from hydrophobic (γ sv1 ) to hydrophilic (γ sv2 ). Owing to the different surface energy, the difference in dynamic contact angles (CAs) will induce movement in the direction of increasing γ sv [76][77][78][79]. Experimental motion studies reveal the velocities to depend linearly on the radius of the wetted area; moreover the droplet will move to the hydrophilic region only when the radius is above a certain critical value [80,81].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In the current design, however, this made an apparent difference between the advancing contact angle and the receding contact angle of the droplet, Fig. 10 The relative position of the speaker, device, and droplet and the direction of displacement: ͑a͒ side view; ͑b͒ top view.…”
Section: Droplet Movement On the Arrowed Surfacementioning
confidence: 91%