2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and Finite Element Analysis of GFRP Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Rectangular Columns Subjected to Concentric and Eccentric Axial Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling of Reinforcing Bars. An isotropic linear elastic behavior was assumed to model the GFRP bars in ABAQUS, up to failure without applying any damage criterion [35,36]. e linear elastic behavior of GFRP reinforcing bars was assumed because of the reason that they show brittle failure after yielding without going to the plastic range as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Tensile Behavior Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modelling of Reinforcing Bars. An isotropic linear elastic behavior was assumed to model the GFRP bars in ABAQUS, up to failure without applying any damage criterion [35,36]. e linear elastic behavior of GFRP reinforcing bars was assumed because of the reason that they show brittle failure after yielding without going to the plastic range as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Tensile Behavior Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four parameters were needed for modelling of reinforcing bars which are Poisson's ratio (]) and modulus of elasticity for elastic behavior and yield strength and corresponding plastic strain for plastic behavior of steel bars. In this study, Poisson's ratio (]) was assumed as 0.3 for steel bars and 0.25 for GFRP bars [35]. e physical properties of GFRP and steel bars used in this research are given in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Tensile Behavior Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 findings were reported. The behaviour of GPC beams were investigated in several experimental studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] while other studies examined the structural performance of GPC columns [23][24][25][26]. In general, these studies showed the structural response of the GPC beams and columns was almost identical to that of OPC and thus concluded that the current design codes and models for OPC structures can be applied to calculate the strength of GPC beams and columns.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amiri et al showed that these elements are proper for non-linear static and dynamic analysis and they follow the constitutive law of integration [11]. Also, the concrete material properties is defined in the software, using concrete damaged plasticity model, with dilation angle () of 40 o , shape factor for yield surface (K) of 0.72 and ratio of initial equi-biaxial compressive yield stress to initial uniaxial compressive yield stress (fb0/fc') of 1.15 [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%