2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00237-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and numerical simulations with 2D disks assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masson and Martinez [18] showed that sample size equal to 7 to 8 times the size of the largest particle was sufficient to obtain a macroscopically representative value when porosity and coordination number were analyzed whilst a size 12 times the largest particle size was required for proper stress tensor evaluation. These results were in agreement with experimental data of Lanier et al [16] and Biarez and Hicher [3].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Masson and Martinez [18] showed that sample size equal to 7 to 8 times the size of the largest particle was sufficient to obtain a macroscopically representative value when porosity and coordination number were analyzed whilst a size 12 times the largest particle size was required for proper stress tensor evaluation. These results were in agreement with experimental data of Lanier et al [16] and Biarez and Hicher [3].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with experimental tests on wooden rods [16] and numerical tests run by other authors. Lanier and Jean [18], for instance, performed biaxial tests on an assembly of rigid non-overlapping disks according to the contact dynamics method using the LMGC software. In Figure 4(b) it is shown that the displacement field obtained from their test is in very good agreement with that obtained by PFC.…”
Section: Biaxial Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to cohesionless granular materials, where the Coulomb friction law and rigid or elastic contact conditions provide a suitable framework for DEM simulations [1][2][3][4], cohesive…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%