Experiments in farmers' collectives in Eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits, and challenges

Abstract

Do farmers' collectives, which pool land, labour, capital, and skills to create medium‐sized production units, offer a more viable model of farming for resource‐constrained smallholders than individual family farms? A participatory action research project in Eastern India and Nepal provides notable answers. Groups of marginal and tenant farmers, catalysed by the project, evolved into four different collective models with varying levels of cooperation, gender composition, and land ownership/tenancy status. Based on 3 years of action research, this paper examines how the models evolved and their differential outcomes. All groups have gained from cultivating contiguous plots in their efficiency of labour and machine use for land preparation and irrigation, and from economies in input purchase. Several collectives of tenant farmers have also enhanced their bargaining power vis‐a‐vis an entrenched landlord class and thus been able to negotiate lower rents and refuse long‐standing feudal obligations. However, the models differ in their extent of economic gain and their ability to handle gender inequalities and conflicts over labour sharing. The paper explores the historical, regional, and cultural factors that could explain such differences across the models. It thus offers unique insights into the processes, benefits, and challenges of farmers' collectives and provides pointers for replication and further research.

Imperatives of recognising the complexities: gendered impacts and responses to COVID-19 in India

“…Although Kerala has some unique features in terms the state government’s commitment to a women-centric approach to development, and favourable social indicators on female literacy, sex ratios, and so on, group farming is not confined to Kerala. It has also emerged (although on a small scale) in Telangana in south India, Gujarat in the west, and Bihar and Bengal in eastern India (Agarwal, 2018 , 2020b ; Sugden et al, 2021 ). In both Gujarat (which has all-women group farms) and Bihar (which has a mixture of all-women, mixed-gender, and all-male groups) the group farmers report being more food secure than individual family farmers.…”

Locked out of livelihoods: impact of COVID-19 on single women farmers in Maharashtra, India

“…Agarwal’s in-depth pre-COVID research on group farming by women in South India shows that women’s collectives in Kerala have done significantly better than individual male farmers in terms of productivity and profits (Agarwal, 2018 , 2020 ); and they have also fared much better during COVID-19 than individual small farmers (Agarwal, 2021a ). Moreover, the research she and her colleagues have done on mixed-gender and women’s collectives in Bihar and northern Bengal further reinforces the conclusion that women (and poor farmers more generally) are better protected economically in collectives than as individual farmers, both in normal times and in times of crises (Sugden et al, 2020 ).This, provides lessons and points to the need for women to work in groups as the way forward.…”

Discourses on the adoption of the Barsha pump: A Q methodology study in Nepal and Indonesia

“…Merely selling an artifact, without a proper training nor timely servicing, may severely compromise SF empowerment and education concerning the BP (Van Loon et al, 2020). In view of increasingly feminized farming settings, like Nepal, where gender-insensitive technology reinforces patriarchal roles of mechanized farming (Devkota et al, 2020;Paudel et al, 2020;Sudgen et al, 2020), the BP may even be more compromised.…”