2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(08)60140-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments of Three-Dimensional Flow Structure in Braided Rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shear layer indicate a high level of turbulence, or a large‐scale coherent structure, which is the main mechanism of the mixing interface in the scenario with no density difference (Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2008). The separation zone is labeled as region A to the left of the shear layer zone, which is a typical characteristics related to the dynamic process in the mainstream‐tributary confluence found both in laboratory experiments (Hua et al., 2009; Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2004) and field surveys (Baranya et al., 2010; Konsoer & Rhoads, 2013; Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2004; Weerakoon et al., 2003). However, during the post TGD period, the separation zone almost disappeared (see Figure 6b), because the momentum of the tributary flow seriously reduced (Mr = 0.07) under the high water level condition, and thus the inertial effect of the lateral flow is too small to form a full separation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear layer indicate a high level of turbulence, or a large‐scale coherent structure, which is the main mechanism of the mixing interface in the scenario with no density difference (Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2008). The separation zone is labeled as region A to the left of the shear layer zone, which is a typical characteristics related to the dynamic process in the mainstream‐tributary confluence found both in laboratory experiments (Hua et al., 2009; Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2004) and field surveys (Baranya et al., 2010; Konsoer & Rhoads, 2013; Rhoads & Sukhodolov, 2004; Weerakoon et al., 2003). However, during the post TGD period, the separation zone almost disappeared (see Figure 6b), because the momentum of the tributary flow seriously reduced (Mr = 0.07) under the high water level condition, and thus the inertial effect of the lateral flow is too small to form a full separation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serger and Nikolay [9] stated that the flow decreased at bifurcation as the flow was separated but it increased at the confluence as the flow converged from multiple channels and this has been agreed upon by many researchers. Hua and Gu [11] studied the flow characteristic at bifurcation and confluence channels with a different width ratio of point bar to channels 1 and 2. The flow at the bigger size remains in the direction of the upstream main channel flow, because the channel with a bigger size is gradually close to the main channel width, so it is easy for water in that channel to hold the direction of the main channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the straight braided rivers, the turbulent flow was strongest in the recirculation zone at the bifurcation, and the contour line of the high turbulence zone tended to be concave bank to convex bank from the bottom to the surface. The turbulence in the confluence segment was also strong (Hua et al, 2009;Khan & Sharma, 2019), and vortex appears at the confluence and the intensity decreases as the water flows downstream(X. Liu et al, 2019;H.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%