The observation has been made frequently (1-5) that monkeys actively immunized with different preparations of the virus of poliomyelitis while developing humoral antibodies, often do not resist either intracerebral or intranasal inoculations of the virus. In this paper we shall present our experiences with the nasal instillation in monkeys which have passed through clinically perceptible attacks of experimental poliomyelitis and the correlation of the effects produced with humoral antibodies present as quantitatively ascertained. The study has practical significance in determining whether a certain concentration of antiviral bodies in vaccinated monkeys has the same value as regards protection to infection as it has in convalescents.The question of reinfection in convalescent monkeys has been studied by F1exner (6) in relation especiaUy to second attacks of the disease in children. Contrary to accepted views, he has found that reinfection takes place in nasally instilled monkeys, and that the second attack may sometimes be induced by the same although apparently oftener by a foreign strain of virus; and he has also made tests for the presence of humoral antibodies to both kinds of strains in the reinfected animals (personal communication).
E X P E I~N T A LReaction of Convalescent Monkeys to Nasal Instillation of Virus.--As early as 1910, Flexner (7) and later others (8 a, 9) showed that monkeys convalescent from experimental poliomyelitis are, with only rare exceptions, resistant to intracerebral inoculation of the same strain of virus.