1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)90003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on crystal/liquid partitioning of Ru, Rh and Pd for magnetite and hematite solid solutions crystallized from silicate melt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This is con sistent with experimental results for partitioning of PGEs between spinel and silicate melt (Capobianco and Drake, 1990;Capobianco et al, 1994). Although there are no data available for partitioning of PGEs and Au between pyroxene/ plagioclase and silicate liquids, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…5). This is con sistent with experimental results for partitioning of PGEs between spinel and silicate melt (Capobianco and Drake, 1990;Capobianco et al, 1994). Although there are no data available for partitioning of PGEs and Au between pyroxene/ plagioclase and silicate liquids, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The authors recovered the PGM in concentrates and showed that the PGM assemblage inTrodUcTion The role of chromian spinel as an important collector of platinum-group elements (PGE) has been confirmed in investigations of the PGE content of different types of chromitites worldwide (e.g., Augé 1985, Ferrario & Garuti 1990, Pedersen et al 1993, Garuti et al 1999, Ahmed & Arai 2003. However, there is now convincing evidence that the PGE are not carried in solid solution in the chromian spinel, as had been proposed from experimental studies (e.g., Capobianco & Drake 1990, Capobianco et al 1994, Righter et al 2004, Pagé et al 2009), but form discrete platinumgroup minerals (PGM). On the basis of in situ textural observations, it has been confirmed that the PGM inclusions in unaltered chromian spinel are near-liquidus phases precipitated from the magma at a very early stage of its differentiation.…”
Section: Previous Work On the Pgm Of Milia Chromititesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Both Ir and Ru are compatible in a nonsulfide phase, in which Pd is incompatible. Both petrological and geochemical studies have suggested that olivine [47,48], spinel or chromite [49,50], and refractory alloys [51,52] are the most likely candidates [7]. However, modeling calculations have shown that neither olivine nor clinopyroxene can significantly fractionate the PGEs [7].…”
Section: Journal Of Geological Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%