1998
DOI: 10.1080/10789669.1998.10391398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on the Dehumidification Performance of a Finned Tube Heat Exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chuah et al [14] also assumed this value for their calculations. More effort has to be focused on this aspect.…”
Section: Wet Fin Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chuah et al [14] also assumed this value for their calculations. More effort has to be focused on this aspect.…”
Section: Wet Fin Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparison was good for heat transfer, while air pressure drop comparison showed higher discrepancies. Chuah et al [14] presented an enthalpydriven effectiveness method equivalent to Threlkeld's [6], providing some comments on the use of the empirical coefficients. Their comparison with experimental data for a single plain fin coil in a 5 Â 4 air and liquid velocities' matrix showed good trends for heat transfer, but a significant over-prediction in mass transfer values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Wang et al, 1996) and (Wang et al, 1997) investigated the effect of fin spacing, fin thickness, number of tube rows on heat transfer and pressure drop with commonly used tube diameters in HVAC coils, under dry and humid conditions respectively. (Chuah et al, 1998) investigated dehumidifying performance of plain fin-and-tube coils. They measured the effects of air and water velocities which they compared to predictions based on existing methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McQuiston method is widely employed [3][4][5][6]. However, it is noted that this analytical approach calculates the wet fin efficiency is based on a formula modified from a dry fin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%