2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03321136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments Regarding the Influence of Pressure Profiling on Laser-Transmission Welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Welding tests with the parameter set PII were performed using P L of 340 W and a clamping force of 2400 N. Figure 9b shows that reducing the P L by 30 W from the Welding experiments using the parameter set PIII were performed with a 10 W higher laser power of 350 W and a clamping force of 2700 N. Similar results were obtained in the case described above, where no pores or other defects such as cracks or burn marks were detected in the weld (Fig. 9c), and only a slightly reduced heating time was observed during sample formation, with a minimum heating time of 4.7 s. A targeted meltdown can be achieved faster with higher laser power [20].…”
Section: Effect Of Position Correction and Laser Powersupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Welding tests with the parameter set PII were performed using P L of 340 W and a clamping force of 2400 N. Figure 9b shows that reducing the P L by 30 W from the Welding experiments using the parameter set PIII were performed with a 10 W higher laser power of 350 W and a clamping force of 2700 N. Similar results were obtained in the case described above, where no pores or other defects such as cracks or burn marks were detected in the weld (Fig. 9c), and only a slightly reduced heating time was observed during sample formation, with a minimum heating time of 4.7 s. A targeted meltdown can be achieved faster with higher laser power [20].…”
Section: Effect Of Position Correction and Laser Powersupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Further studies are needed to clarify this point. Overall, the strength of our assemblies is higher than those achieved by Potente et al when welding PEEK T-joint specimens with similar thicknesses for the transparent substrate [18]. They achieved a maximum strength of 40 MPa, while our minimum is of the same value for both types of assemblies.…”
Section: Fig 6 A4/sc-p2 Assembly Cross-section Along the Welding Path...contrasting
confidence: 46%
“…For the sake of brevity, only the second group is presented in this article. Moreover, the presence of water within the specimens has been proved to be detrimental to the joint integrity and mechanical resistance of welds [38]. For this reason, careful drying is necessary before assembling the specimens.…”
Section: Characterization Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%