2016
DOI: 10.2514/1.b35873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments with Ejector Rocket Entrainment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, pure sea-level static test results simulating the takeoff stage were not available. There are more recent reports on ejector designs improvement by Etele et al [19], which did not include secondary injection for thrust production, so that they could not be regarded as whole engine models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, pure sea-level static test results simulating the takeoff stage were not available. There are more recent reports on ejector designs improvement by Etele et al [19], which did not include secondary injection for thrust production, so that they could not be regarded as whole engine models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has been shown that a key aspect of RBCC engine performance is the air mass flow at the inlet [25]. Therefore, increasing air entrainment by utilizing an annular rocket-ejector exhaust profile has been the focus of both numerical [26] and experimental [27,28] studies. In both the simulation and experimental data, the results indicated that an annular, or semi-annular, exhaust provides superior air entrainment over a circular profile.…”
Section: The Rbcc Enginementioning
confidence: 99%