2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standardization of terms was provided by the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code and the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases (Jacobs et al., 2021 ). Importantly, this has recently been further amended by Tretter and colleagues (Tretter et al., 2023a , 2023b ). HREM is a valuable technology for morphological analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization of terms was provided by the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code and the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases (Jacobs et al., 2021 ). Importantly, this has recently been further amended by Tretter and colleagues (Tretter et al., 2023a , 2023b ). HREM is a valuable technology for morphological analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic valvar repair is increasingly pursued for treating aortic valvar pathologies when feasible, aiming to restore valvar function and avoid the need for valvar replacement. This, however, requires a thorough understanding of the complex anatomy of the aortic root and its valve, and technical proficiency which is only obtained with experience and time spent on this steep learning curve [1]. Accurate evaluation of the repaired valve is crucial for assessing immediate surgical outcomes and optimizing post-operative management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%