1996
DOI: 10.1016/0950-5849(95)01045-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert judgement as an estimating method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence to suggest that practitioners use analogies when making estimates by means of informal methods [8]. Our approach allows users to assess the reasoning process behind a prediction by identifying the most analogous projects thereby increasing, or reducing, their confidence in the prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is some evidence to suggest that practitioners use analogies when making estimates by means of informal methods [8]. Our approach allows users to assess the reasoning process behind a prediction by identifying the most analogous projects thereby increasing, or reducing, their confidence in the prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been criticized by Hughes [8], among others, as effectively being two distinct measures that should not be combined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the existence of many other more formal or semiformal alternatives there remains strong evidence of the continued use of expert judgment in project management (Heemstra, 1992;Host and Wohlin, 1998;Hughes, 1996) and there is little suggestion that it will be entirely superseded by other approaches. However, there is also evidence of bias in such expert estimation (DeMarco, 1982;.…”
Section: Expert Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the frequently-used evaluation methods expert judgement is mainly used for the qualitative assessment; the Monte Carlo simulation method and decision tree analysis are used for the quantitative assessment; and the analytic hierarchy process-based method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and grey evaluation are used for the qualitative-quantitative assessment. Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages (see Table 1), and is applicable for different situations [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The comparison of strong and weak points between those evaluation methods have been discussed, which indicates that the comprehensive evaluation method is superior to a single quantitative or qualitative evaluation method [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%