2017
DOI: 10.4135/9781473970595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Experts” on Value-Added Models in Education: A Five-Question Qualitative Online Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the sample group may have otherwise been known to the researchers as fellow nurse educators, colleagues, researchers, or students; the online method may have contributed to more authentic and trustworthy responses in a small membership group, as found by Geiger and Pivovarova (2017). While a disadvantage of online qualitative surveys is the lack of clarification from an interviewer, parameters and definitions of ecological consciousness, environment, and ecohealth were purposely left open as we sought subjective accounts and interpretations for this initial, exploratory study of the topic.…”
Section: Qualitative Survey Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many of the sample group may have otherwise been known to the researchers as fellow nurse educators, colleagues, researchers, or students; the online method may have contributed to more authentic and trustworthy responses in a small membership group, as found by Geiger and Pivovarova (2017). While a disadvantage of online qualitative surveys is the lack of clarification from an interviewer, parameters and definitions of ecological consciousness, environment, and ecohealth were purposely left open as we sought subjective accounts and interpretations for this initial, exploratory study of the topic.…”
Section: Qualitative Survey Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%