2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01794-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experts’ preferences for sarcopenia outcomes: a discrete-choice experiment from a working group of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) in collaboration with the European Union of Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS)

Abstract: Background and aims To assess experts’ preference for sarcopenia outcomes. Methods A discrete-choice experiment was conducted among 37 experts (medical doctors and researchers) from different countries around the world. In the survey, they were repetitively asked to choose which one of two hypothetical patients suffering from sarcopenia deserves the most a treatment. The two hypothetical patients differed in five pre-selected sarcopenia outcomes: quality o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also in accordance with latest data from experts in the field considering falls as most import outcome. 28 Thereby, agreement on detailed operational definition of clinical outcomes (e.g., falls‐related hospitalization, or overall self‐reported falls, overall fractures, or osteoporotic fractures) is key to enable meta‐analytical comparison of predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also in accordance with latest data from experts in the field considering falls as most import outcome. 28 Thereby, agreement on detailed operational definition of clinical outcomes (e.g., falls‐related hospitalization, or overall self‐reported falls, overall fractures, or osteoporotic fractures) is key to enable meta‐analytical comparison of predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle strength and physical performance can be measured directly with different assessment tests [13] (▶ Fig. 1a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical function is de ned as an objectively observable systemic body mobile function. It involves not only muscle function, but also nervous system function, which is a multidimensional concept [2]. Decreased physical function increases the risk of falls in older adults [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%