2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1007150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expiration-Day Effects - An Asian Twist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bollen and Whaley 13 and Kan 14 showed no evidence of order imbalance or significant increase in trading activity, increased volatility, or price reversal on expiration days in Hong Kong. Chow, Yung, and Zhang 15 , for the same market, reported some evidence of return volatility but no effect on trading volume on expiration days in sharp disparity with Fung and Yung 16 who observed high trading volume and insignificant price effect. Corredor, Lechon, and Santamaria 17 with the Spanish data showed significant increase in the trading volume of the underlying asset, but no strong and systematic effect on the price and volatility of underlying asset on expiration days.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Bollen and Whaley 13 and Kan 14 showed no evidence of order imbalance or significant increase in trading activity, increased volatility, or price reversal on expiration days in Hong Kong. Chow, Yung, and Zhang 15 , for the same market, reported some evidence of return volatility but no effect on trading volume on expiration days in sharp disparity with Fung and Yung 16 who observed high trading volume and insignificant price effect. Corredor, Lechon, and Santamaria 17 with the Spanish data showed significant increase in the trading volume of the underlying asset, but no strong and systematic effect on the price and volatility of underlying asset on expiration days.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The Hong Kong market also uses Asian‐style settlement procedure, where the contracts are settled against the estimated average settlement price, which was the arithmetic average of the underlying cash index taken every 5 minutes on the expiration day. Fung and Yung () found that though the trading was higher on the expiration day and was concentrated around 5‐minute marks, there was no evidence of price reversal on the following day. They concluded that the use of “Asian‐style settlement procedure reduces the market pressure at contract expiration dates by spreading index‐related trades over a period of time.” Unlike Sweden and Hong Kong, where the unwinding pressure is possibly reduced by the use of prices over an extended time period on the expiration day, the LIFFE at London for FTSE 100 contracts and Paris for CAC‐40 contracts use an average price over a shorter time period but exclude the highest and lowest prices.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, research on expiration effects has been extended to other markets. As a result, the increased trading volume of underlying assets on the day of a derivative's expiration was detected on the markets of Japan (Karolyi [1996]), Germany (Schlag [1996]), Australia (Stoll and Whaley [1997]), Sweden (Alkebäck and Hagelin [2004]), Poland (Morawska [2007]), China (Fung and Jung [2009]), Spain (Illueca and Lafuente [2006]), and India (Narang and Vij [2013]), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%