One of the most provocative observations is that, by stereology measures, smokers do not appear to have an increase in AM numbers. This is in conflict with studies demonstrating an increase in BAL macrophages from smokers (12). Interestingly, prior data support the authors' present observation, suggesting that the extent of the response in BAL was overrepresented by an analysis in lung tissue sections (13). Though not directly explored in this study, a possible explanation for these divergent findings is that AMs from smokers may be easier to lavage during BAL, thereby increasing their measured numbers. Alternatively, the authors identified that IMs were increased in smoker lung tissue, which appeared to be mostly due to an increase in macrophages in the alveolar septum. The role of the IMs in this setting were not clearly defined but these data do suggest the potential importance of defining IM function in exposure conditions like cigarette smoke and, ultimately, in disease states like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In total, this study continues to expand on our understanding of macrophages based on lung tissue location. It offers tantalizing insights into further tissue specification of macrophages and suggests that more work needs to be done, both to identify tools for isolation but also to focus on macrophage functions in these distinct regions. Ultimately, further work in these areas will allow the research community to truly grasp the diverse functional roles of macrophages with a goal of being able to tune these functions to limit tissue damage and/or injury and mitigate chronic lung disease. n Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.