2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainable machine learning based efficient prediction tool for lateral cyclic response of post-tensioned base rocking steel bridge piers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are categorized as standalone and ensemble models. Standalone models used in the study include LR, SVM, ANN, and KNN, and ensemble models include bagging, GBM, XGBoost, RF, and ET [34,37,49,56,57].…”
Section: Modeling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These models are categorized as standalone and ensemble models. Standalone models used in the study include LR, SVM, ANN, and KNN, and ensemble models include bagging, GBM, XGBoost, RF, and ET [34,37,49,56,57].…”
Section: Modeling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, however, use implicit algorithms to capture both linear and nonlinear relationships compared to empirical regressions [14,[34][35][36] to solve intricate problems [37], and can therefore be applied for effective estimation of the TDS from EC and temperature. AI models have been strongly recommended in recent years for the prediction of WQPs and have been applied in the accurate estimation of water quality index (WQI) compared to conventional models [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performances of different machine learning algorithms, such as k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, and random forest, were compared. Wakjira et al (2022) investigated the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting the lateral cyclic response of post-tensioned base rocking steel bridge piers and proposed an explainable machine learning based predictive model. Malekjafarian et al (2019) proposed a two-stage machine learning approach to detect damage in bridges using the responses obtained from a passing vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recent studies have developed a flexural capacity prediction model as well as an efficient and user-friendly software tool for both fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-RC beams [15] and corroded RC beams [16]. The process of establishing the above model is achieved through training and evaluating various ML models, ranging from the simplest to the most complex, to determine the most efficient and accurate model [17]. However, the above model cannot achieve multioutput prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%