2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainable machine learning-based model for failure mode identification of RC flat slabs without transverse reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 lists the major hyperparameter potential values used by each ML model in grid search. In order to determine the final prediction model, its prediction performance needs to be tested by five-fold cross validation [ 20 ]. Table 2 presents the values of the major hyperparameters of the ML model, as well as the mean scores of five-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Model Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 lists the major hyperparameter potential values used by each ML model in grid search. In order to determine the final prediction model, its prediction performance needs to be tested by five-fold cross validation [ 20 ]. Table 2 presents the values of the major hyperparameters of the ML model, as well as the mean scores of five-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Model Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ML can be applied to predict the mechanical properties and durability of reinforced concrete structures and to evaluate their service life. At present, some scholars have used ML models to analyze reinforced concrete beams [ 18 ], squat reinforced concrete walls [ 19 ], reinforced concrete slabs and other engineering problems [ 20 , 21 ]. Whatever the accuracy, however, the black-box nature of the predictions makes ML models unexplainable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of black-box machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence techniques has shown great promise in predicting complex structural behaviors [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These data-driven methods can have the potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of punching shear capacity predictions by capturing intricate relationships among the influencing factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) approach was used to elucidate the factors influencing the predictions [1]. In another study [16], an effective prediction model was developed, chosen from eight ML-based models, to determine the failure mode of flat slabs based on 610 experimental data points. XGBoost surpasses other models, achieving a 99.02% accuracy rate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four performance indicators are used to compare the performance of the final prediction models: average, coefficient of variation COV, root mean square error (RMSE), and lower 95 % value. To display the advantages of the ML models, two design provisions (CSA 23.3-14 [18], and ACI 318-19 [7]), as well as two prediction models proposed by Tian et al [4], and Wu et al [19], are utilized to compare the prediction performance of ML models. Based on the existing ML model, MCS is used to analyze the dependability of a slab-column structure in a realworld engineering application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%