2007
DOI: 10.5175/jswe.2007.200500560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Comfort With Homosexuality Among Social Work Students: The Impact of Demographic, Contextual, and Attitudinal Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Logan and Kershaw (1994) found that social work education contains a heterosexist bias. Swank and Raiz (2007) discovered that having a class that explicitly explores homophobia cultivated a greater acceptance of gays and lesbians for social work students. In particular, schools of social work and even more specifically child welfare courses should prepare potential foster child and adoption workers to properly assess and advocate for gay and lesbian adoptive parents.…”
Section: Parent Sexual Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logan and Kershaw (1994) found that social work education contains a heterosexist bias. Swank and Raiz (2007) discovered that having a class that explicitly explores homophobia cultivated a greater acceptance of gays and lesbians for social work students. In particular, schools of social work and even more specifically child welfare courses should prepare potential foster child and adoption workers to properly assess and advocate for gay and lesbian adoptive parents.…”
Section: Parent Sexual Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, those who hold sexist beliefs also tend to have higher levels of sexual prejudice in non-social work samples (Davies, 2004;Whitley, 2001). In social work student samples, those who hold sexist beliefs are also more likely to have increased prejudice (Black et al, 1998) as well as those who hold traditional gender beliefs (Swank & Raiz, 2007). Similarly, Green (2005) found a positive correlation between accepting views of gay and lesbian people and gender equity among practitioners.…”
Section: Covariates Of Sexual Prejudicementioning
confidence: 91%
“…While understanding the role between sexism and sex-specific sexual prejudice is important, future research with faculty should examine views about gender roles as such measures would address both male and female roles. Earlier research has found that individuals who adhere to beliefs reinforcing traditional gender roles tend to express more biases against same-sex sexuality (Alden & Parker, 2005;Black et al, 1998;Swank & Raiz, 2007).…”
Section: Political Ideology and Sexismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies conducted with either practitioners (Green, 2005) or students (Black et al, 1998;Swank & Raiz, 2007) focus on attitudes related to gender and race and have found these variables to be positively associated with attitudes toward gay and lesbian people. The link between attitudes about other oppressed groups and sexual minorities has not been considered, nor has the link with broad critical consciousness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In comparison to studies with social work educators, the views of social workers (Berkman & Zinberg, 1997;Crisp, 2007;Green, 2005;Krieglstein, 2004) and social work students (Black, Oles, Cramer, & Bennett, 1999;Black, Oles, & Moore, 1998;Cluse-Tolar, Lambert, Ventura, & Pasupuleti, 2005;Cramer, 1997;Logie, Bridge, & Bridge, 2008;Newman, Dannenfelser, & Benishek, 2002;Swank & Raiz, 2007) concerning sexual minorities, in particular gay men and lesbian women, have received considerable empirical attention. Consistent with a large body of research involving the general population, these investigations have examined the effect of sex, age, race, religious affiliation, and religiosity (i.e., importance of religion) in relation to attitudinal outcomes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%