Explaining Elections in Singapore: Dominant Party Resilience and Valence Politics

Abstract

The People's Action Party (PAP) of Singapore is one of the world's longest ruling dominant parties, having won every general election since the country's independence in 1965. Why do Singaporeans consistently vote for the PAP, contrary to the expectations of democratization theories? We argue that valence considerations—specifically, perceptions of party credibility—are the main factor in the voting behavior of Singapore's electorate, and are critical to explaining the PAP's resilience. Furthermore, we argue that the primacy of valence politics arose in part by design, as the PAP has used its control of Singapore's high-capacity state to reshape society and thereby reshape voter preferences towards its comparative advantages. We use a multi-methods approach to substantiate this argument, including a comprehensive quantitative analysis of recent elections. Ultimately, our findings suggest that a focus on valence politics can increase the resilience of dominant parties, but that such a strategy also faces natural limits.

Singapore’s Responses to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Critical Assessment

“…The GRC ostensibly exists to ensure minority representation, as parties need at least one minority candidate in each GRC team. However, there is little doubt that the GRC system heavily favors PAP (Oliver & Ostwald, 2018), and indeed, the party has held power continuously since Singapore’s independence in 1965. Despite the unique features of Singaporean politics, however, elections are far from meaningless: voters genuinely can, and at times do, vote in the opposition in certain seats.…”

Becoming citizens: Policy feedback and the transformation of the Thai rice farmer

“…At a more advanced level, policy delivery can also determine and shape perceptions of citizenship, especially ideas about what rights, responsibilities, and access to resources are part of the social contract. Policy delivery, then, can shape what voters expect and demand from the state, including what types of state behavior they find acceptable (Oliver and Ostwald, 2018).…”

A spatial valence model of political participation in China

“…In Russia, for instance, while ideological distance was a significant factor in the 2007 Duma elections, a voter’s opinion of Vladimir Putin was the most important factor for vote choice (Schofield and Zakharov, 2009). Similarly, in Singapore, ideological alignments are a lesser factor than valence issues, such as perceptions of party credibility, in voting decisions (Oliver and Ostwald, 2018). Valence differences also explain why political parties in electoral autocracies fail to converge on the mean voter.…”