This paper presents a survey of the emotions of the ancient Greeks, as defined and illustrated by Aristotle, and offers a systematic comparison with emotions as conceived today. The object is to exhibit the differences between the ancient and modern classifications, and to indicate some areas where the classical interpretation can shed light on contemporary issues in the psychology of the emotions.Key words: emotion, Greece, comparative psychology, social constructionismThat there are broad similarities in the range and nature of emotions across cultures is clear enough; equally certain is the fact that particular terms for emotions in one culture do not necessarily map exactly onto those in another. What is more, the differences may be systematic, in the sense that, taken together, both the inventory of basic emotion terms in a culture, and the specific character of the several emotions included, may reveal a coherent structure of feeling that differs in determinate ways from that of other cultures (for cross-cultural approaches to the emotions, see Abu-Lughod, 1999;Casimire & Schnegg, 2003;Lutz, 1988). Finally, the entire system may be seen to bear a relationship to values and beliefs within the culture at large, which is in turn distinctive in respect to that of other societies.
THEORETICAL CONTEXTThere is, of course, a school of thought that holds that emotions are universal, in which case cross-cultural comparisons are otiose. Charles Darwin's last book, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872; rev. ed. 1998), related the emotional life of human beings to that of the more primitive species from which mankind had evolved. Darwin supposed that certain expressive features in humans are as innate and universal as snarling is to dogs. So too, the human smile and other expressive behaviors were treated by Darwin as invariants over different populations and cultures: "With all the races of man the expression of good spirits appears to be the same, and is easily recognized" (Darwin, 1998, p. 211). Darwin confirmed his hypotheses by examining descriptions of human responses drawn from different cultures, particularly those that he and his contemporaries regarded as primitive.