1994
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog1802_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Emotions

Abstract: taken from a diary study of emotions indicate that the abductive approach to explanotory reasoning about emotions offers significant advantages. We found that the majority of the diary study examples connot be explained using deduction alone, but they can be explained by making abjuctive inferences.These inferences provide useful information relevant to emotional states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, though, preand postmodern challenges to the dominant paradigm of enlightenment rationality have made it possible for emotions to be given more than passing attention in the conceptual schemes of disciplines like sociology where they had long been rejected, and even (a little) in the critical study of law (Bandes, 1999;Henderson, 1987;West-Newman, 2001a, 2001b. Scholars in many disciplines now offer empirical evidence and conceptual analyses showing that reason and emotion work always in combination (Barbalet, 1998;Damasio, 1996;O'Rorke andOrtony, 1994, Reddy, 2001).…”
Section: Anger Reason and Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, though, preand postmodern challenges to the dominant paradigm of enlightenment rationality have made it possible for emotions to be given more than passing attention in the conceptual schemes of disciplines like sociology where they had long been rejected, and even (a little) in the critical study of law (Bandes, 1999;Henderson, 1987;West-Newman, 2001a, 2001b. Scholars in many disciplines now offer empirical evidence and conceptual analyses showing that reason and emotion work always in combination (Barbalet, 1998;Damasio, 1996;O'Rorke andOrtony, 1994, Reddy, 2001).…”
Section: Anger Reason and Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, twenty-two classes of eliciting conditions are identi®ed, including joy; distress; happy for; gloat; resent; sorry for; reproach, and angry at. Among the emotions with the simplest speci®cation is the well-being emotion distress (written in PROLOG-style form close to actual code, see also O'Rorke and Ortony [1994]). distress(L1,L2,F, d; Sit) if wants(L1,F,d Des … F †; Sit) and holds(non-F,Sit) An agent L1 may experience distress over some state of a airs (or``¯uent'') F in a situation Sit if L1 wants a¯uent that does not hold in Sit.…”
Section: Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the emotion domain, abductive inference is needed to construct the explanation of Mary's relief (Table 7) and many other explanations of emotion elicitation (see O'Rorke and Ortony 1992;1994). In general, in the emotion domain, abductive hypothesis formation generates inferences about the mental states (beliefs, desires, expectations, etc. )…”
Section: Abductive Hypothesis Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1990). More complete accounts of the case study of emotion elicitation are given in (O'Rorke and Ortony 1992;1994). A fuller account of the acquisition of qualitative decision rules is given in O' Rorke, El Fattah, and Elliott (1993a,b).…”
Section: Related Work Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%