2008
DOI: 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2008.tb00025.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Fortifications in Indo‐Pacific Prehistory

Abstract: This paper puts forward the premise that fortifications are uniquely suited to addressing questions of climatic variation and human response, as they are large, permanent repositories of human history, and also reflect behaviors directly associated with conflict, territorialism, and the limits of local environments. A revision of theoretical perspectives and a model of conflict derived from human behavioral ecology can better direct future research. In application, this model outlines a program of research for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(81 reference statements)
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sites include ring-wall mounds and complex ridge-top fortifications which were likely selected for their defensive potential, not only because of their locations within the landscape but also because of the ability to enhance natural defenses by artificial structures, mostly walls, sometimes ditches (Robb and Nunn 2011). Such sites play a prominent role in the late prehistory of Fiji as well as other island groups in the Pacific islands (Best 1984(Best , 1992Clunie 1977;Cochrane 2005;Crosby 1988;Field 2003Field , 2008Gifford 1951;Groube 1970;Kirch 1984;Palmer 1967Palmer , 1969Parry 1977Parry , 1982Parry , 1987Pearl 2004;Sand et al 2000).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These sites include ring-wall mounds and complex ridge-top fortifications which were likely selected for their defensive potential, not only because of their locations within the landscape but also because of the ability to enhance natural defenses by artificial structures, mostly walls, sometimes ditches (Robb and Nunn 2011). Such sites play a prominent role in the late prehistory of Fiji as well as other island groups in the Pacific islands (Best 1984(Best , 1992Clunie 1977;Cochrane 2005;Crosby 1988;Field 2003Field , 2008Gifford 1951;Groube 1970;Kirch 1984;Palmer 1967Palmer , 1969Parry 1977Parry , 1982Parry , 1987Pearl 2004;Sand et al 2000).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many scientists have connected the change in settlement pattern observed in Pacific Island groups with the region‐wide outbreak of conflict between and within coastal‐tethered communities (Goff & McFadgen ; Nunn ,b Nunn Field ; Field & Lape ). It is inferred that the coastal settlements that most people occupied before conflict began were generally exposed to attack and unable to be readily defended, largely because they were located on low coastal plains where no natural defences were available.…”
Section: Evidence For 14th‐ and 15th‐century Disruption Of Pacific Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gifting of fish sometimes took place as part of a feast, which could involve the gathering of several tribes. Warfare, raiding, conquest and enslavement were also common, as a result of population pressure and competition for the best agriculture land (Field 2008;Nunn 2007). The construction of elaborate fortifications on prominent hills and headlands is indicative of the martial, tribal culture associated with Maori.…”
Section: Temperate Coastal Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%