Discrete‐Event Simulation and System Dynamics for Management Decision Making 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118762745.ch09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining puzzling dynamics: A comparison of system dynamics and discrete‐event simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper complements previous work comparing SD and DES, e.g., Morecroft and Robinson (2014). Barlas and Özgün conclude that DES provides better results for systems containing a small number of entities and servers but DES and SD provide similar outputs when the scale of the system increases (many servers and entities).…”
Section: Demonstrations Of How Multi-methods Approaches Feature In Sd supporting
confidence: 65%
“…This paper complements previous work comparing SD and DES, e.g., Morecroft and Robinson (2014). Barlas and Özgün conclude that DES provides better results for systems containing a small number of entities and servers but DES and SD provide similar outputs when the scale of the system increases (many servers and entities).…”
Section: Demonstrations Of How Multi-methods Approaches Feature In Sd supporting
confidence: 65%
“…After the trade facilitation measures were defined, the discrete-event simulation method was chosen (Morecroft & Robinson, 2005) and it has been recommended for modeling stochastic arrival rates (Haughton & Isotupa, 2012). In addition, discrete event simulation allows those involved in the process of analysis and decision makers to directly influence the model development.…”
Section: Customs Broker Customs Brokermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingalls [67], on the other hand, points out that DES can play a significant role in modelling supply chains at a strategic and tactical level. In their study comparing DES and SD, Morecroft and Robinson contemplate that there is not a straightforward distinction between the two approaches, but that it is rather a result of a careful consideration of various criteria: "Perhaps there is both 'strategic DES' and 'operational SD' and it's just a matter of which components you chose for your simulated enterprise" [99]. Meanwhile, others consider the use of combined or hybrid approaches, especially for modelling supply chains.…”
Section: Opinions On the Nature And Level Of Use Of Des And Sdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others claim that the divide between the two modelling approaches might not be so clear-cut. Different aspects of the same problem may be highlighted by each modelling approach [99], but on the other hand, if the problem is similarly represented in both approaches, similar outcomes can be observed from the users' point of view [140].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%