2017
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining sex differences in lifespan in terms of optimal energy allocation in the baboon

Abstract: We provide a quantitative test of the hypothesis that sex role specialization may account for sex differences in lifespan in baboons if such specialization causes the dependency of fitness upon longevity, and consequently the optimal resolution to an energetic trade-off between somatic maintenance and other physiological functions, to differ between males and females. We present a model in which females provide all offspring care and males compete for access to reproductive females and in which the partitionin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accumulated burden of reproduction may be particularly challenging for female apes who invest heavily in singleton offspring requiring years of care, and whose reproductive success is dependent on survival to old age [5]. Alternatively, the selection of females may compensate for slow reproductive rates by increasing investments in immune defence that promote survival and future reproduction [68]. Despite the straightforward predictions, the extent to which cumulative reproductive effort impacts variation in health and ageing within and among wild ape species is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accumulated burden of reproduction may be particularly challenging for female apes who invest heavily in singleton offspring requiring years of care, and whose reproductive success is dependent on survival to old age [5]. Alternatively, the selection of females may compensate for slow reproductive rates by increasing investments in immune defence that promote survival and future reproduction [68]. Despite the straightforward predictions, the extent to which cumulative reproductive effort impacts variation in health and ageing within and among wild ape species is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic studies indicate that the mechanisms which are the focus of research in conventional model organisms, like worms, flies and rodents, have not been major targets of selection in humans and are unlikely to explain interspecific variation in longevity among primates [48]. The combination of a long life and extensive parental investment has shaped primate life course strategies [49,50], potentially affecting not only how quickly we age but also how we age. Primates are indispensable for examining aspects of cognitive, neurobiological and social ageing that are simply not captured in existing animal models.…”
Section: Challenges and Benefits Of Comparative Ageing Research On Non-human Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because interactions between the products of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA (nDNA) are central to metabolism, these mitonuclear interactions might be expected to have different effects in males and females, who often have quite different metabolic demands 5,6,7 . Indeed, even if the two sexes have equivalent metabolic rates, they may have dramatically different energy allocations to different tissue types or life history components 8,9,10 . Selection on mtDNA may also be sex-biased due to the asymmetrical inheritance of mtDNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%