2011
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining spatial variability in stream habitats using both natural and management‐influenced landscape predictors

Abstract: ABSTRACT1. The distribution and composition of in-stream habitats are reflections of landscape scale geomorphic and climatic controls. Correspondingly, Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) are largely adapted to and constrained by the quality and complexity of those in-stream habitat conditions. The degree to which lands have been fragmented and managed can disrupt these patterns and affect overall habitat availability and quality.2. Eleven in-stream habitat features were modelled as a function of landscape comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), to describe relationships between instream habitat and landscape conditions (Anlauf et al. ), and to understand patterns of juvenile Coho Salmon habitat use (Steel et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), to describe relationships between instream habitat and landscape conditions (Anlauf et al. ), and to understand patterns of juvenile Coho Salmon habitat use (Steel et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geomorphic features and measurements are georeferenced, allowing for distance downstream and habitat unit lengths to be calculated in a geographic information system (GIS) (Moore et al 1997(Moore et al , 2007. A robust literature using AIP field survey data has demonstrated the relevance and utility of this methodology to explain patterns of Coho Salmon occupancy (Steel et al 2012;Flitcroft et al 2014), to describe relationships between instream habitat and landscape conditions (Anlauf et al 2011), and to understand patterns of juvenile Coho Salmon habitat use (Steel et al 2016).…”
Section: Identifying Potential Seasonal Habitat and Calculating Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a larger scale, macro-scale HSM analyse the abiotic factors controlling the spatial patterns of species distributions in river networks, catchments or river basins. This approach has been successfully applied using several techniques, including Generalized Linear Models (Anlauf et al, 2011), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (Leathwick et al, 2005) and Artificial Neural Networks (Olaya-Mar ın et al, 2012). These studies combined variables derived from several sources and applied different techniques to reveal potentially suitable areas for the target species (Fukuda et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating effective complexity indices is challenging . Existing indices have proven useful but often only measure a few variables, use qualitative variables, do not explain why a particular set of variables were chosen, or simply do not predict distribution better than individual habitat features (Clark et al 2004, Gratwicke and Speight 2005, Anlauf et al 2011, França et al 2012, Kovalenko et al 2012. Our three indices that combined individual discontinuities showed how habitat heterogeneity was linked to striped bass distribution.…”
Section: Striped Bass and Additive Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 91%